:format(webp))
We started with spreadsheets and a belief that cash works. Five years later, we're turning what we built into shared infrastructure — for anyone who wants to use it.
In 2020, we started Social Income with a simple belief: giving cash directly to people in extreme poverty is one of the most effective ways to create lasting change. The evidence backed it up. What we didn't anticipate was a far more mundane problem.
There was no software to run a cash transfer program. Nothing that could handle donations, select recipients, track mobile money payments, confirm transfers, and stay transparent month after month.
No Tool, No Problem. Or So We Thought.
So we started anyway and improvised with spreadsheets, improvised workflows, and a lot of manual work.
And we began building the platform we wished existed.
From day one, this was built by an open-source community: developers with day jobs who showed up at night. Quite a few came from big tech companies, putting their skills to work for something that matters. Progress was tangible: feature by feature, bug by bug, payment by payment. Over time, the rough edges smoothed out. We learned what actually matters when you're running programs in the field: what breaks, what needs to be simple, and what has to be bulletproof.
If It Works for Us, Why Should It Only Work for Us?
Then a question kept surfacing: if this works for us, why should it only work for us?
Many organisations want to run cash transfer programs but struggle to get started — and most stop there. What if there were a tool that took care of international payments, recipient selection, fundraising, and monitoring? Organisations might actually launch a pilot. That's our bet. It also felt like a second way to live our mission: not just by raising more donations ourselves, but by helping others deliver cash to people in need.
Making this vision real meant rebuilding the platform so it could be used securely by multiple organisations at the same time, and scale to thousands of beneficiaries across different countries. That's not a small undertaking. It needed sustained investment and developers who could contribute during the day, not just after work hours.
On Money and Principles
We were firm on how we'd fund it: we wouldn't redirect donations meant for recipients, and we weren't interested in outside investors. We were never trying to build a business anyway. So we went looking for foundations that fund exactly this kind of shared, public-interest infrastructure. Not every door opened. But one did.
In 2025, we began a four-year partnership with the Somaha Foundation, which committed close to half a million Swiss francs to make it possible. We defined clear goals for the first two years — not just to track progress, but to stay accountable to the people this work is meant to serve.
)
Our Platform Partner
By the end of year one, we aim to have 500 beneficiaries enrolled in multi-year programs, with three programs run by partner organisations across two countries. By the end of year two, we want to reach 1,000 beneficiaries, five partner-run programs, and active work in three countries.
From here, we build — the same way we always have, just faster and for more people. Our KPIs are public, our code is open, and every payment is tracked. If you want to follow along or contribute, everything is on GitHub.
Sandino ScheideggerKeep reading
)
Article
March 12, 2026
Recommended Reading
)
Social Income
A suggested reading list to provide a foundational understanding on topics such as Social Income, Basic Income, financial aid, and poverty
)
Article
March 09, 2026
Beyond Happiness: UBI and the Question of Agency
)
Kerrin Dieckmann
If happiness can be measured, can freedom?
)
Article
March 05, 2026
Population Decline: Is the Solution to Pay Parents More?
)
Sandino Scheidegger
The negatives of population decline are well documented. So is the proposed fix: Pay parents more to boost birth rates. Straightforward on paper, far less convincing in practice.